What does it mean to find an employee that truly "fits" your
organization? What does a good
"fit" look like from the perspective of the applicant? Organizational fit, job fit, and motivational
fit are key factors that drive how new employees will assimilate to the work
environment, mesh with the corporate culture, as well as how the individual
will perform in their role.
Meet Jim, an aspiring sales executive whose background is in the finance
industry. Jim is looking to gain
exposure outside of the financial industry and to attain a role that moves him
up the proverbial "ladder". In
the finance industry, Jim excelled in various sales roles, acquiring greater
levels of responsibility very quickly.
He has thrived in the structured, regulation-driven environment in which
his company operated within the industry.
Looking to expand upon his professional résumé, Jim is now exploring
employment with organizations across various industries. Although Jim's experience has primarily come
within the finance industry, he believes that he can easily transfer his
knowledge and skills to a different environment.
What is the best fit for Jim? Organizations,
of course, are very focused on finding the ideal fit for not only the position
they are looking to fill, based on skills and experiences, but also for a good
match to their environment and culture.
But how many companies focus on ensuring that their role, corporate
environment, and organizational culture are truly an ideal fit for the
applicant? It is easy to assume that if
we, the organization, find the ideal fit for the role, then the organization
must be a perfect fit for the individual as well. Unfortunately, this assumption may be
inaccurate at times. Applicants are
eager to make a good impression during their interview and may have the
propensity to sacrifice concerns or misgivings of their fit to the role or the
organization in order to give the "correct" answer or tell the interviewer
what it is they think they want to hear.
Going back to our friend, Jim...Jim
is interviewing for a sales manager role with a successful computer system
design company. The company is a
trend-setting, forward-thinking organization focused on innovation and leading
the way in the industry. Jim has had
some qualms over whether or not he would be comfortable working in such an
"outside the box" environment.
His previous experience was in a very structured, guidelines-driven
environment that he thoroughly enjoyed and felt comfortable. Although he questions his fit to the computer
system design company, he goes forward with the interview and is hired. Nine months later, Jim is living in a land of
ambiguity and is surrounded by creative minds who are more comfortable
"bending the rules" than abiding by them. Jim is not comfortable in his position nor in
the organizational environment, which is a stark contrast to his ideal work
situation. Jim is back on the search for
a role and company that is truly a good fit for him.
Jim's situation is not an uncommon one.
This "mis-fit" between applicant and environment results in
reduced morale, job satisfaction, as well as increased absenteeism and
turnover. This costs the organization
time and money on hiring, on-boarding, and training processes, while costing
the employee stress, time out of work, and emotional well-being. But how in the world do companies figure out
if the two-way street of "fit" is in alignment?
Interviews and supporting hiring tools, such as personality inventories,
can be invaluable to ensuring this alignment.
Although neither is a "magic elixir", asking very detailed,
targeted interview questions that uncover the individual's work and style
preferences can elicit critical information needed to determine fit. Moreover, personality inventories, such as
the Behavioral Insight®, provide the interviewer with information about the
candidate that extends beyond the skills and experiences commonly found on the
résumé. Personality assessments allow
the hiring manager to gain insight into the innate behavioral tendencies of the
applicant, including information regarding natural motivators and drivers. Where these motivations strongly differ from
the work environment or characteristics of the role, the interviewer can probe
to gain a better understanding of the potential misalignment between the
candidate and the role/organization.
No comments:
Post a Comment