In today’s business arena, it
has become increasingly conceivable for one to get caught up in the hype of
catch phrases that travel around the conference room. As business professionals, we tend to want to
use a flashy term that is fresh to gain attention and perhaps put a novel spin
on an old idea. Sometimes, we simply
want to use a term that we have continuously heard used in corporate
settings. In particular, one phrase I
hear too often misused is Emotional Intelligence (EI). It is one of the most frequent inadequately
defined terms I hear, especially when used to describe either sales or
management techniques. More commonly I
hear people using and defining EI as nothing more than simple self-awareness. The term Emotional Intelligence, sometimes
called EQ or Emotional Quotient, has been in use for well over 20 years
now. However, it continues to gain in
popularity in corporate settings. The
time seems ripe to provide a bit of a background and overview.
The truth is that it is not
necessarily the fault of the masses when they incorrectly define and apply
EI. Authorities in the peer-reviewed
literature actually fail to agree on one standard definition of EI. Divergent viewpoints are quite common in the
literature and unfortunately there is currently no measurement of EI that
passes the rigorous psychometric standards of many personality assessments, or that
is acceptable for use in employee selection.
Many measures should probably not be applied in developmental efforts
either. However, there are two
approaches that serve as the basis for the most widely studied measures
currently in use that will help to elucidate what EI is beyond simple
self-awareness.
The most popular and widely-applied
approach in organizational settings is what is known as the
"mixed-model" approach, so called because it is a mixture of some
classic personality traits and Emotional Intelligence abilities. Many of these approaches break down EI into four
main components, as follows:
- Self-Awareness - this is ability to read one's own emotions and to recognize their impact while using those "gut" feelings to guide decisions
- Self-Management - which involves controlling one's own emotions and impulses and adapting them to changing circumstances
- Social Awareness - which is the ability to sense, understand, and react to others' emotions while also maintaining an understanding of social networks
- Relationship Management - this is the ability to inspire, influence, and develop others while managing conflict
The other is the Ability-Based
Model, which is much more academic in practice and of a more theoretical
basis. Noteably, measurement of
Ability-Based EI tends to be more difficult and does not lend itself to
self-report type instruments which are of course, the easiest to
administer. The distinguishing factor
for pure Ability-Based EI is that EI is defined as a type of intelligence and
is innate. In short, it can not be
developed. There is a much more
cut-and-dry background to this theoretical basis which also tends to limit its
utility and application in a business setting.
The Ability-Based definition is as follows:
“The capacity to reason about emotions, and of emotions to enhance thinking. It includes the abilities to accurately perceive emotions, to access and generate emotions, so as to assist thought, to understand emotions and emotional knowledge, and to effectively regulate emotions so as to promote emotional and intellectual growth." (Mayer & Salovey, 1997)
As you can see, although the
approaches to measurement of EI may be very different academically, the two
approaches describe a similar entity.
Further, this entity is considerably more than simply being “self-aware.” Rather, it is about managing one's own
emotions and effectively managing relationships. The draw of being able to measure an
individual's capacity for such a thing is certainly understandable. However, it is a "buyer beware"
marketplace for certain when it comes to choosing an instrument to measure
EI. Some of the best selling and most
popular EI instruments have been excessively disparaged in the literature. If you are in the market for an EI measure,
you would be wise to consult an expert such as someone with a background in
psychometrics. Good test makers will always
provide a technical manual of how their instrument was validated. Having an expert review these manuals will
help to lessen the chance of improperly measuring the EI of individuals in your
organization. EI tends to be a construct
that carries much more emotional repercussions than personality, therefore, it
is all the more important to do your diligent research when selecting a tool.
If you are interested in
learning more about how TalentFirst can help you to understand Emotional
Intelligence and how it can help your organization, give us a call at (908)
725-2500 or visit our website at www.talentfirst.com. We will be more than happy to assist you.